Started By
Message

re: Federal judge rejects bids to halt Georgia prosecution of Trump aides over 2020 election

Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:16 am to
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80522 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:16 am to
I anticipate crickets from here on out
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I anticipate crickets from here on out
In a world populate by sane people, perhaps.

I anticipate that citing the relevant statute will probably draw a majority of downvotes.
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 11:22 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I anticipate crickets from here on out

You're about to get the "well they're not following the laws, so we shouldn't have to" responses.
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I anticipate crickets from here on out
I anticipate you STFU.

I also don't give a F anymore about playing by the rules against evil shits who don't care about the rules. Either we have a Constitution or we don't. If we don't, then all these losers in robes or with podiums have ZERO authority over anyone.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51095 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I anticipate crickets from here on out


Nah, we all know Hank doesn't have the first clue. He is consistently wrong in his legal interpretations. All legal analysis from him is rightly ignored.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram