re: The only proof anyone needs re: election fraud is that nobody can prove there wasn’t any.

quote:

---

Scrutinizing the results of an election is not the same thing as conspiring to place false electors, pressuring election officials to “find” votes, leaning on the Vice President to go against his constitutional duty,

---

So - what were the DEM representatives in 2016 doing who objected to seating the GOP electors because of "voter suppression" in THOSE states.

what trial proved any 'voter suppression" THAT case??? Were those representatives committing treason?? ==> btw - that happens EVERY time a DEM loses an election - EVERY TIME!!!

There is a constitutional process for airing out that - and that is what the GOP was trying to do ---- HOWEVER - there was this little to-do going on on the steps of the capitol at the VERY MOMENT those arguments were going to be made in the CONGRESS - and lo and behold, the SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE - declared an EMERGENCY - and initiated a CONTINGENCY provision to SKIP THE CHALLENGE and go DIRECTLY to the final COUNT.

SO - the INSURRECTIONISTs were very instrumental in SUBVERTING THE CONSTITUTION - they prevented the CHALLENGE from taking place.

how 'fortunate' - those wascally insurrectionists played right into Pelosi's hand