- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge rules in favor of activists in climate trial
Posted on 8/14/23 at 1:15 pm to WPBTiger
Posted on 8/14/23 at 1:15 pm to WPBTiger
quote:We could argue all day about whether including this language in the state constitution constitutes good policy, but (given that it IS there) is the ruling entirely unreasonable?
Judge ... ruled that Montana’s continued development of fossil fuels violates a clause in its state constitution that guarantees its citizens the right to a “clean and healthful environment.” Montana is one of several states that have explicit environmental guarantees written into their state constitutions.
4
Posted on 8/14/23 at 2:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
We could argue all day about whether including this language in the state constitution constitutes good policy, but (given that it IS there) is the ruling entirely unreasonable?
Lawyers and "the law" will add to the death of this nation.
Posted on 8/14/23 at 2:21 pm to AggieHank86
I know a document that says
We need to release those we hold captive then.
quote:.
secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
We need to release those we hold captive then.
Posted on 8/14/23 at 2:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
We could argue all day about whether including this language in the state constitution constitutes good policy, but (given that it IS there) is the ruling entirely unreasonable?
How did did I know Hanky would be in here sucking the judge's arse?
Yes Hanky, it is entirely unreasonable in that there is no evidence that "fossil fuels" have frickall to do with global warming. It is also entirely unreasonable, in that even if fossil fuels were proven to have frickall to do with global warming, given that it is GLOBAL warming how does Montana do anything about the fossil fuels being burned by President Biden, Nancy Pelosie, Chuck Schumer, all the rest of the elite climate alarmists flying around on their private jets to educate us of the dangers of fossil fuels, not to mention China and India?
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 8/14/23 at 4:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
We could argue all day about whether including this language in the state constitution constitutes good policy, but (given that it IS there) is the ruling entirely unreasonable?
Yes.
If you pee in the pool, you cannot complain about the concentration of urine in the pool.
These young plaintiffs contributed to the "problem".
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News