re: Confrontation over Deer

EF's Previous Post:

11 Years as a State Game Warden, and a
CJ degree, i’ll throw my opinion in .

I do not know the whole story. I do not know if the subject that was struck, was the aggressor. It is a tiny video. I could not see what , if anything , the subject who was struck had in his hands.

Both the 2 x4 yielding man, and the shovel yielding man, would absolutely be arrested for Aggravated Battery.

If i was the subject in the white shirt, or his friend in the passenger side of cab, i would have shot dead the subject who used the 2 x 4, then the shovel yielding subject. Unless, as i said, i cannot see what the subject had in his hands , in the video. But if i was the subject in the white shirt, empty handed, and was hit with the 2 x 4, i would have killed him dead.

If the white shirt victim went there to the others house and started sheet, he is the aggressor. Technically , aggressors cannot claim self defense. But, if the use of deadly force was also not in line ( 2 x4, shovel ) then the visitor could immediately kill both if he had a hidden weapon.

Totality of circumstances would apply.
I doubt that video supplies all. Whats the feud over ? Any previous threats? What did white shirt go there for there?

EF Hutton,

The redneck came over to those people’s domicile and was the aggressor. The walking tall old man and shovel boy defended themselves and their families from the crazed redneck. Then the crazed redneck destroyed property. Crazed redneck f’d around and found out.

If I’m on the jury for aggravated assault of the two defenders of the family domicile, that’s a hard “not guilty” from me.