- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California votes AGAINST making the human trafficking of a minor a serious felony...
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:55 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:55 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:I am not going to write you a treatise, but you can begin with Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833–34, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1976–77, 128 L. Ed. 2d 811, 822–23 (1994) (holding that prison officials are obligated to protect prisoners from violent attacks by other prisoners); see, e.g., Bistrian v. Levi, 696 F.3d 352, 370–71 (3d Cir. 2012) (finding that plaintiff stated a constitutional claim against officials who had placed him in a recreational yard with other prisoners whom officials knew were likely to retaliate against plaintiff).quote:You're going to need to cite that BS, Hank
violate the Constitution at the same time.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 5:05 pm to AggieHank86
quote:So prisons must be abolished if prisoners are subject to violent attacks by other prisoners?
Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833–34, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1976–77, 128 L. Ed. 2d 811, 822–23 (1994) (holding that prison officials are obligated to protect prisoners from violent attacks by other prisoners)
Child rapists must never be imprisoned because they run risk of violent attacks by other prisoners?
Did you presume your citations had anything with the Constitutionality of preexisting CA law?
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 5:11 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News