Started By
Message

re: California votes AGAINST making the human trafficking of a minor a serious felony...

Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:55 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

quote:

violate the Constitution at the same time.
You're going to need to cite that BS, Hank
I am not going to write you a treatise, but you can begin with Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833–34, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1976–77, 128 L. Ed. 2d 811, 822–23 (1994) (holding that prison officials are obligated to protect prisoners from violent attacks by other prisoners); see, e.g., Bistrian v. Levi, 696 F.3d 352, 370–71 (3d Cir. 2012) (finding that plaintiff stated a constitutional claim against officials who had placed him in a recreational yard with other prisoners whom officials knew were likely to retaliate against plaintiff).
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124700 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833–34, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1976–77, 128 L. Ed. 2d 811, 822–23 (1994) (holding that prison officials are obligated to protect prisoners from violent attacks by other prisoners)
So prisons must be abolished if prisoners are subject to violent attacks by other prisoners?
Child rapists must never be imprisoned because they run risk of violent attacks by other prisoners?

Did you presume your citations had anything with the Constitutionality of preexisting CA law?
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 5:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram