- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:01 am to UncleFestersLegs
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:01 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
look at your posts in this thread.
OK
quote:
. You spend 90% of them complaining
You've already started lying
quote:
that Q conspiracies are the problem and not the actual traffickers
Quote me where I said this, specifically. Not an inference/interpretation. Where I stated this.
quote:
you might have some undiagnosed mental problems tbh
You might need to educate yourself on simple concepts. That's an example of a loaded question. The one used more in common vernacular is "When did you stop beating your wife?", but I made it more specifically relevant to this topic.
The dishonesty involved in a loaded question fallacy is the reliance on an untrue declaration/assumption/presumption that effectively walls in the response. Since you probably need more explanation, I'll use the example you quoted:
When did you stop abusing your children?
The dishonest declaration/assumption/presumption was the fact that you abuse your children. See how it boxes in any legitimate response?
Or, I can use the quote to which I responded when giving that example:
You also seem to be much more upset about qanon than child traffickers
It's not a perfect comparison b/c it's not a "question", but it uses the same dishonest framing technique.
The irony is, you continued to do this with the very post to which I'm responding, as quoted above:
You spend 90% of them complaining that Q conspiracies are the problem and not the actual traffickers.
Or you can go back to the post I responded to prior to your injection to see more examples:
Leave it to liberals to down play child sex trafficking
That quote involves TWO dishonesties.
And my response remains more true than ever (since more posters are relying even more on dishonest framing/arguments):
quote:
The beginning of that plan requires using proper terminology and discussing this honestly, which you jut showed you're either unwilling or unable to do. That ties into the Q stuff, b/c that stupidity, again, has created a lot of dishonest arguments and beliefs around the issue and ignores the reality, which means any desire coming from that dishonesty has little chance of doing anything.
You're then left with Leftist-style virtue signaling.
fin
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News