- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:36 pm to tzimme4
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:36 pm to tzimme4
Not a doubt in my mind this guy is a pedo, dead serious. You have to ask why people would immediately come out and scream "right wing conspiracy!". Why not just say yes this is going on, everybody knows it is, and we've got to stop it. Why dismiss it as Q-Anon paranoia when the damn movie itself is about true events. There's only one reason to do that
2
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:38 pm to Corso
I think it's because Caviezel says the real-life character he plays in the movie is saving children from DUMs and adrenochroming.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:41 pm to Corso
quote:
Why not just say yes this is going on, everybody knows it is, and we've got to stop it.
Because dishonest arguments are used to inflate the impact of this activity, especially domestically. To tie it into the OP, is anyone disputing that the Q stuff did not rely heavily on allegations of powerful people trafficking minors for sex?
quote:
Why dismiss it as Q-Anon paranoia
Why did Q-Anon paranoia dishonestly amplify this issue and lie about it? That goes both ways.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News