Started By
Message

re: House Sellers: How common is it for a seller to require proof of funds before even showing

Posted on 7/5/23 at 7:26 pm to
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
1379 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 7:26 pm to
Pre approval should be good enough but they may have been burned before.

I recently got burned. A preapproval didn’t show problems until underwriting and I wasted 45 days under contract.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
15341 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 7:32 pm to
POF or pre-approvement letter was required every time I sold a house. You should have financing in order before looking. Therefore, a pre-approvement letter should be simple.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22871 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 5:33 am to
quote:

Pre approval should be good enough but they may have been burned before. I recently got burned. A preapproval didn’t show problems until underwriting and I wasted 45 days under contract.


Did you keep their earnest money?
Posted by NorCali
Member since Feb 2015
1047 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 9:19 am to
Yes, underwriting is the issue. A banks that rhymes with Bells Cargo that I used for my last mortgage really screwed me over in underwriting and it essentially lowered the loan amount and forced me to give a larger down payment. Of course this happened at day 35 when I only had 45 days on the accepted offer letter so I couldn’t go shop around for another mortgage. Underwriting has caused other contracts to fall through locally as well. So in an active area at a price point with a lot of competition, this isn’t unreasonable. Also probably increases the chance of a 10 day close.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram