Started By
Message

re: proposed speck and redfish changes

Posted on 7/3/23 at 7:34 pm to
Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
10251 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

I agree with you 100%, but the ldwf should get the ugly end of the stick pointed at them here. Why can’t they produce any credible study on why they are doing what they are doing? If I felt there was an actual problem, I’d want limits reduced as well. It just seems this is a knee jerk reaction they’ve had their hearts set on from 3yrs ago.


Well according to their studies, the numbers have been in decline since early 2000's, yet every time a reduction is on the table, they say they need to re-evaluate how they do their studies. Its crazy!!
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28367 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Well according to their studies, the numbers have been in decline since early 2000's, yet every time a reduction is on the table, they say they need to re-evaluate how they do their studies. Its crazy!!


Please direct me to these studies. Last one I’m aware of was conducted in River water. Also, why are they trying to push this through at a meeting during a holiday week?
This post was edited on 7/3/23 at 7:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram