Started By
Message

re: There’s no negative to not starting Skenes

Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:50 pm to
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12513 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

You can avoid this. If there’s a man on first and second with no outs in the first inning, bring Skenes in.

You know he's not actually magical, right? He's the best pitcher in college baseball, but even the best pitcher is liable to give up a run or two in bad situations. Waiting to get into a bad situation before putting him in isn't a guarantee that we will get out of it clean. And 1 or 2 runs could very easily be the difference in a game against their ace.

Not starting Skenes is 100% risking tomorrow's game in the hopes of getting him for the Championships Series. That is precisely what "saving him" means. And whether it's a smart bet or a dumb bet, it's definitely a gamble.

Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
14805 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

That is precisely what "saving him" means.


Not starting him isn’t saving him. I never once said he shouldn’t play tomorrow.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

Not starting Skenes is 100% risking tomorrow's game in the hopes of getting him for the Championships Series. That is precisely what "saving him" means. And whether it's a smart bet or a dumb bet, it's definitely a gamble.

This.

And the big question is, how effective would Skenes be on 5 days rest? Has he done it before after >100 pitches?

This isn't the slam dunk people seem to think it is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram