- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chase Burns Throat Slash Under Review by NCAA
Posted on 6/14/23 at 10:09 am to DeafVallyBatnR
Posted on 6/14/23 at 10:09 am to DeafVallyBatnR
quote:
Or it was not seen by the umpires.
That's my point. If it wasn't seen by any of the umpires, it wasn't egregious enough to be direct taunting.
It's all moot as it was a joke tweet though.
2
Posted on 6/14/23 at 10:26 am to ProjectP2294
I realizes the tweet is a joke, but I don't agree with this
The taunting rules are dumb and go way too far; but it is possible for players to taunt the opposing team without being seen by the umps who have other aspects to pay attention to.
quote:
If it wasn't seen by any of the umpires, it wasn't egregious enough to be direct taunting.
The taunting rules are dumb and go way too far; but it is possible for players to taunt the opposing team without being seen by the umps who have other aspects to pay attention to.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 10:46 am to ProjectP2294
quote:Your point makes no sense at all.
That's my point. If it wasn't seen by any of the umpires, it wasn't egregious enough to be direct taunting.
That's to say if someone shot and killed someone but it wasn't seen then it wasn't really bad at all.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News