- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: They’re Going After Justice Clarence Thomas Now (Again)
Posted on 4/7/23 at 3:10 pm to Lightning
Posted on 4/7/23 at 3:10 pm to Lightning
quote:
We are saying opposite things and you don’t see the contradiction?
The Act absolutey includes the SC. There is no provision in the act that specifically precludes the supreme court. Though Roberts is skeptical, he has neither proved nor disproved it's constitutionality. In that context, what is the law?
2
Posted on 4/7/23 at 3:26 pm to highanklesprain20
That is his whole point - that the legislative branch doesn’t have the authority to dictate how the judicial branch operates. They can put whatever provision in whatever act they want to and the Supreme Court can say “nah, we’re not doing that.”
And who would have the authority to decide if Congress could legislate a code of conduct for the Supreme Court justices?
The Supreme Court.
And who would have the authority to decide if Congress could legislate a code of conduct for the Supreme Court justices?
The Supreme Court.
Posted on 4/8/23 at 5:50 am to highanklesprain20
quote:
The Act absolutey includes the SC
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News