re: Will Wade's Hearing Date

quote:

---

Scott Woodward had Wade’s back and was not intimidated as long as it was “he said, she said.”

But then Wade had to frick all that up by leaving a paper trail. Then Woodward had no choice but to jettison him.

Scott Woodward is worth 100 times more to LSU athletics than Will Wade ever was or ever will be.

With what Woodward has done for LSU athletics since he’s been here, if he wants to take ten years to rebuild MBB, that’s fine with me.

I don’t give a shite. Wade fricked it all up in the first place. It’s not Woodward’s mess. Woodward is cleaning up Wade’s mess.

---

That's BS, he never had Wade's back. Ask anybody around the athletic department. Scott was begging for a reason to get rid of him, and the moment he could fire him...he did.

No, the NOA is not a "paper trial." The NOA was allegations that it does not appear the NCAA was able to support. If the NCAA supported its allegations against Wade before the IARP, he would have in fact been hit with a multi-year show cause. Why is this such a difficult concept for people to grasp, the NOA is a series of allegations the NCAA is making. It still had to be supported by evidence that was usable under the NCAA bylaws. The NCAA knew it couldn't do this, so they made the NOA said as bad as possible to put pressure on LSU to fire Wade.

Anybody that has an ounce of understanding as to what is required to prove the allegations under NCAA bylaws before the IARP knew from day 1 those allegations could not be supported.

quote:

---

With what Woodward has done for LSU athletics since he’s been here, if he wants to take ten years to rebuild MBB, that’s fine with me.

---

Then please stop commenting. No athletic program should take this long to rebuild and if that is acceptable to you then are more interested in worshipping Woodward than seeing LSU succeed. You are part of the problem, not the solution.