- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 73 year old rancher shoots and kills illegal immigrant on his ranch.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:32 am to brass2mouth
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:32 am to brass2mouth
His use of deadly force doesn’t appear to be protected by any of that. Reference 13-407.
2
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:38 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:the daily Mail article directly contradicts the plain language of the statue, as follows:
His use of deadly force doesn’t appear to be protected by any of that. Reference 13-407.
quote:To be generous, that is irresponsible reporting. People who read that bullshite will think that this is indeed the law, and more people will be shot (and prosecuted) as a result.
But under Arizona law, deadly force is allowed on one's own property if the homeowner believes it 'immediately necessary' to prevent trespassing.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:42 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
His use of deadly force doesn’t appear to be protected by any of that. Reference 13-407.
Not from what we know currently, No.
Going to depend what his statement to the police is/was. The good thing about these laws it is shifts the responsibility back to the state to prove he wasn’t acting in accordance and not him having to prove he was. He’s automatically assumed to have acted accordingly.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News