- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fixed index annuity
Posted on 2/5/23 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 2/5/23 at 7:42 pm
Sorry if this has been discussed but couldn't find it.
Any thoughts on fixed index annuities, pro or con? I know there's a lot of different options/ products.
Any thoughts on fixed index annuities, pro or con? I know there's a lot of different options/ products.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 7:53 pm to gungho
Need more info. Why is it being proposed to you?
Posted on 2/5/23 at 7:53 pm to gungho
I had a Variable Annuity with Vanguard that had these options. I'm not familiar with fixed ones.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 8:42 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
Run
why run?
Will not consider Variable Annuity-was in one for short time years ago and got out just in time before i lost any.
this is a fixed index. It's being proposed to me because the agent wants to make money. I'm considering it because of the protection of principal in a qualified account. Will make up about 12-13% of my qualified funds. The rest of my assets are cash, real estate besides primary residence, and life insurance cash value, besides SS.
the one i'm considering is 7yr, free 10% annual withdrawal, decreasing withdrawal charge each year, 9% cap on 50% of the assets, the other 50% is at 0% due to a 2-yr point-to-point spread but has about 7% annualized return on the lowest 10-yr period over the last 22 yr.
This post was edited on 2/5/23 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:54 pm to gungho
There are other ways to safely protect your money for 7 years. Other ways that are less punitive if you need the money early. And can probably guarantee a comparable rate of return.
How old are you?
Is annuitizing the annuity part of the attraction for you?
How old are you?
Is annuitizing the annuity part of the attraction for you?
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:23 am to meansonny
66y/o. Do not plan to annuitize
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:11 am to gungho
I guess the next questions are
What percentage of your worth is real estate?
What percentage is cash?
What percentage is cash value life insurance?
You seem to be avoiding market exposure.
Most people looking at annuities are tucking a small percentage away from market exposure (the annuity). You seem to be tucking a small percentage into market exposure.
What is the annuity indexed to?
What percentage of your worth is real estate?
What percentage is cash?
What percentage is cash value life insurance?
You seem to be avoiding market exposure.
Most people looking at annuities are tucking a small percentage away from market exposure (the annuity). You seem to be tucking a small percentage into market exposure.
What is the annuity indexed to?
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:19 am to gungho
My first gut reaction would be for you to use a broker/dealer who can set up a bond strategy.
You should be able to get those returns without the huge commission tying up your money for 7 years.
A good broker/dealer cuts out middleman fees. And can structure the plan to acquire near maturity bonds to reduce risks. Municipals can give tax benefits.
But.
If you are so diversified that you do not need the funds for 7 years (100% guaranteed) and for some reason you are avoiding market exposure for those 7 years (which is a mistake in my opinion, but that would be a different thread), the annuity may be a good fit.
For me personally, I'm in the market with a 7 year duration for all of my funds. Your age doesn't matter. The duration does. And 7 years out doesn't scare me. You can change the strategy 3 to 4 years in for a safer position and come out ahead of the annuity.
You should be able to get those returns without the huge commission tying up your money for 7 years.
A good broker/dealer cuts out middleman fees. And can structure the plan to acquire near maturity bonds to reduce risks. Municipals can give tax benefits.
But.
If you are so diversified that you do not need the funds for 7 years (100% guaranteed) and for some reason you are avoiding market exposure for those 7 years (which is a mistake in my opinion, but that would be a different thread), the annuity may be a good fit.
For me personally, I'm in the market with a 7 year duration for all of my funds. Your age doesn't matter. The duration does. And 7 years out doesn't scare me. You can change the strategy 3 to 4 years in for a safer position and come out ahead of the annuity.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 8:25 am to gungho
You have a lot of assets tied up into illiquid investments my friend.
If you want to pay some broker 7% commission on a product to never hear from him again then by all means…
If you want to pay some broker 7% commission on a product to never hear from him again then by all means…
Posted on 2/6/23 at 12:19 pm to meansonny
real estate-19% (inclu residence, income-producing prop)
cash-15%
CV life-8%
Index: 50% with S&P 500; 50% with a Franklin index.
No commission up front-i realize commission/fees are in the spread.
Interest-rate risk scares me with bonds, as does equity-risk, but more comfortable with equity.
No need for the annuity funds for the forseeable future. Though will be maturing about the time RMD's are in play, have considered protecting a portion of assets in annuity to fund RMDs (at least a portion)
I can fund living expenses with cash and SS for 3 yr or so. Considering when/if to convert trad IRA to Roth.
cash-15%
CV life-8%
Index: 50% with S&P 500; 50% with a Franklin index.
No commission up front-i realize commission/fees are in the spread.
Interest-rate risk scares me with bonds, as does equity-risk, but more comfortable with equity.
No need for the annuity funds for the forseeable future. Though will be maturing about the time RMD's are in play, have considered protecting a portion of assets in annuity to fund RMDs (at least a portion)
I can fund living expenses with cash and SS for 3 yr or so. Considering when/if to convert trad IRA to Roth.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 12:36 pm to gungho
It sounds like you’re not interested in any downside market risk whatsoever, right?
Posted on 2/6/23 at 12:51 pm to slackster
That's correct-for a portion of my assets. If I had zero risk tolerance, I'd have it all in cash or annuity, but I don't want to totally sacrifice growth. My proposed annuity represents 5% of net worth and will come from a qualified account, mainly to protect a portion of assets in case of another (or more severe) downturn like we've had the last year or two and I need to access those funds. If I have to, I will be able to withdraw a portion of the annuity free of charge that together with SS would almost meet living expenses.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:09 pm to gungho
In that case, a fixed index annuity can serve a purpose. I’d shop around and see what other options exist within the space though. Ideally you want a straight forward S&P 500 point to point cap option, preferably 1 year terms. These proprietary indexes that some firms offer can be a pain in the arse to track and/or actually make intelligent decisions around.
Brighthouse (formerly MetLife) offers an interesting option with their Shield Level annuities. For example, you can get a 6-yr S&P 500 linked option that has a 500% upside cap with 10% downside protection - if the market is up, you receive the gain up to 500%. If it’s down over the 6 years, Brighthouse will eat the first 10% of losses, and you’re on the hook for the rest. They offer other variations within the 6-yr surrender schedule, like a 1-yr option with 25% downside and 13.5% upside cap. I just pulled these off of their public website.
I don’t sell products, but I’m not too stubborn to admit they have a place for the right situation.
Brighthouse (formerly MetLife) offers an interesting option with their Shield Level annuities. For example, you can get a 6-yr S&P 500 linked option that has a 500% upside cap with 10% downside protection - if the market is up, you receive the gain up to 500%. If it’s down over the 6 years, Brighthouse will eat the first 10% of losses, and you’re on the hook for the rest. They offer other variations within the 6-yr surrender schedule, like a 1-yr option with 25% downside and 13.5% upside cap. I just pulled these off of their public website.
I don’t sell products, but I’m not too stubborn to admit they have a place for the right situation.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:12 pm to slackster
Don't buy a buffered annuity. Get a traditional fixed index annuity with 100% downside protection if you get one at all.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:20 pm to gungho
It sounds like you know the downside risk on the annuity..
Anything over 10% withdrawal comes with a severe punishment (that is your frontload cost). But if you avoid the charge for 7 years, the only downside is annuity management fees and withdrawal/access fees (which are high. You may want to get those in writing). But they aren't as punitive as the surrender charge.
For those that price shop fees, annuities are typically some of the worst with management.
So long as you know those going in and you need market aversion, I think you are fine with the annuity.
Anything over 10% withdrawal comes with a severe punishment (that is your frontload cost). But if you avoid the charge for 7 years, the only downside is annuity management fees and withdrawal/access fees (which are high. You may want to get those in writing). But they aren't as punitive as the surrender charge.
For those that price shop fees, annuities are typically some of the worst with management.
So long as you know those going in and you need market aversion, I think you are fine with the annuity.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:25 pm to meansonny
quote:
the only downside is annuity management fees
Fixed index annuities don't have fees unless you add a rider. The fees are built in the participation rates or cap rates.
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:27 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Don't buy a buffered annuity. Get a traditional fixed index annuity with 100% downside protection if you get one at all.
Why not?
A 25% downside buffer would have been broken only twice using calendar years since 1957 in the S&P 500. That trade off for 13.5% upside is well worth it, in my opinion (within the space of annuity products).
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:29 pm to slackster
quote:
It sounds like you’re not interested in any downside market risk whatsoever, right?
quote:
That's correct-for a portion of my assets.
Maybe we have different definitions of "whatsoever".
Posted on 2/6/23 at 1:37 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Maybe we have different definitions of "whatsoever".
I was just throwing out a hybrid product that may give him another option.
Popular
Back to top

3



