Started By
Message

re: Mind-blowing: The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion

Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:46 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79525 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:46 pm to
Can't that be extended to anything?

If I think people who have severe mental illness are expendable and should be discarded, am I automatically morally inferior to someone who thinks they have innate value?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73532 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Can't that be extended to anything?



Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Can't that be extended to anything?
I see your point, but there is a significant difference.

I doubt that even one percent of the population would see it as being moral/ethical to end the life of a living, breathing human due to mental illness. There is an almost-visceral feeling that rights vest when an organism leaves the birth canal, regardless of whether that feeling is logical.

By contrast, less than half the population feels the same way about an embryo, and the share of the population who feels the same way about a zygote or blastocyst may be SMALLER than the share that would kill that disabled adult.

In a coherent society, it makes sense to act in concert where there is near-unanimity. Less so, when society is fractured on the issue, and legislation would pass (if at all) by the slimmest of margins.

It is what it is.
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 4:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram