- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Burrow & Chase robbed of a TD...
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:12 pm to cajuntiger1010
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:12 pm to cajuntiger1010
Does the 3rd foot down (which he had) not negate the bullshite surviving the ground rule?
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:16 pm to Pharmdbamafan
quote:
Does the 3rd foot down (which he had) not negate the bullshite surviving the ground rule?
No idea, these rules are too vague and have too many exceptions. That may have been right according to the rules. but it should be simplified. Did you control the ball with 2 feet down? yes then TD simple as that. This controlling it to the ground even if it is out of bounds is ignorant. But that is the way they want rules "vague" so they can control outcome of games.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:16 pm to Pharmdbamafan
quote:
Does the 3rd foot down (which he had) not negate the bullshite surviving the ground rule?
Yes...not to mention being in the endzone. It should have been a TD IMO
Posted on 1/22/23 at 4:05 pm to Pharmdbamafan
quote:
Does the 3rd foot down (which he had) not negate the bullshite surviving the ground rule?
I feel like the rule was intended for diving catches. Now if you go down voluntarily after 2 steps it’s analyzed
This post was edited on 1/22/23 at 4:06 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)