Started By
Message

re: If that's not a catch rule has gone too far

Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13955 posts
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:12 pm to
The defender literally pulled the ball loose. Why should that be ignored? It wasn’t a catch.
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18600 posts
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:13 pm to
I’m not even watching the game and know it was a catch.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The defender literally pulled the ball loose. Why should that be ignored?

Because the status of touchdown kills the play so once that theoretical "catch" is made, it's over. Should have been a TD and play over the millisecond his 2nd foot came down in bounds
This post was edited on 1/22/23 at 3:15 pm
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36255 posts
Posted on 1/22/23 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

The defender literally pulled the ball loose


What people are arguing is that happened AFTER he had possession with both feet in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram