- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update on Will Wade Sanctions - Won't Receive Show Cause
Posted on 1/21/23 at 9:05 pm to ellessuuuu
Posted on 1/21/23 at 9:05 pm to ellessuuuu
quote:
Yes, the NCAA has bylaws that, among other things, control what type of information that can be used to issue the finding of a violation. One of the prohibited categories of information is anonymous sourced information. Seriously, google NCAA committee on in fractions bylaws. Educate yourself before you make stupid statements again.
Who said they were anonymous, a-hole?
And they have bent and broken their fricking rules so many times to get programs. If you believe Lester Earl, they did it to LSU by coercing him to lie so they could nail Dale Brown 30 years ago. They literally changed their definition of how coaches who played at a school can be retroactively viewed as boosters a few days before a season to rule James Wiseman ineligible at Memphis a few years ago. They put out an open call for dirt on Huge Freeze with blanket immunity after they re-opened their investigation on Ole Miss.
They do this shite all the time. What’s hilarious is you sitting here quoting the made-up rules of an organization that everyone knows operates like the mob when they’re out for a program. You are really fricking naive.
Posted on 1/21/23 at 9:11 pm to misey94
The Dawkins tape was an anonymous source. You know why, the DOJ never released it. Instead it was leaked by Dawkins lawyers. Because it was leaked and not authenticated by the DOJ, it's anonymous.
My statement earlier in the thread was that he could potentially avoid violations, because all the NCAA had was anonymous sourced information. I’ve been saying this from day one.
If he avoids a show cause, then it’s safe to say that they did not prove any level one allegations against him.
Keep in mind this case was handled by the independent review panel. Not like the old days where it was handled in-house at the NCAA.
FYI. If they don’t follow their bylaws and sanction a coach or school in a way that blatantly ignores the bylaws and cost that coach/school income, they can be sued. The bylaws have a binding effect, just like a contract.
ETA. Love the downvotes. It’s easier than responding to someone who knows what they’re talking about.
My statement earlier in the thread was that he could potentially avoid violations, because all the NCAA had was anonymous sourced information. I’ve been saying this from day one.
If he avoids a show cause, then it’s safe to say that they did not prove any level one allegations against him.
Keep in mind this case was handled by the independent review panel. Not like the old days where it was handled in-house at the NCAA.
FYI. If they don’t follow their bylaws and sanction a coach or school in a way that blatantly ignores the bylaws and cost that coach/school income, they can be sued. The bylaws have a binding effect, just like a contract.
ETA. Love the downvotes. It’s easier than responding to someone who knows what they’re talking about.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 9:20 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News