Started By
Message

re: Recourse against Garcia Roofing

Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:52 am to
Posted by csorre1
Member since Apr 2010
6497 posts
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Flashing is a common leak point if its not done correctly.


This was an Ida replacement, and they claim they didn't touch the flashing. If it needed to be replaced, should they not have done that? The roofer who did my house said sometimes companies skip flashing even if it needs it because it takes a lot of time.
Posted by BeachTiger2018
Pinellas County FL
Member since Aug 2022
715 posts
Posted on 12/30/22 at 11:44 am to
Does your sister still have a copy of their bid/contract from when they replaced it after Ida, or the insurance companies estimate that Garcia agreed to? It should be itemized and show any and all flashing work they were supposed to do or were paid to do. Some flashing such as pipe boots, chimney, and step flashing is pretty standard on full replacements. In fact I can't recall ever not seeing an insurance company pay for those in the ten years I was an adjuster, unless it was a situation where they had previously been covered and not replaced in a prior claim.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram