- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Recourse against Garcia Roofing
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:52 am to BeachTiger2018
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:52 am to BeachTiger2018
quote:
Flashing is a common leak point if its not done correctly.
This was an Ida replacement, and they claim they didn't touch the flashing. If it needed to be replaced, should they not have done that? The roofer who did my house said sometimes companies skip flashing even if it needs it because it takes a lot of time.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 11:44 am to csorre1
Does your sister still have a copy of their bid/contract from when they replaced it after Ida, or the insurance companies estimate that Garcia agreed to? It should be itemized and show any and all flashing work they were supposed to do or were paid to do. Some flashing such as pipe boots, chimney, and step flashing is pretty standard on full replacements. In fact I can't recall ever not seeing an insurance company pay for those in the ten years I was an adjuster, unless it was a situation where they had previously been covered and not replaced in a prior claim.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News