- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: MRNA Vaccines Increase Risk of Contracting COVID-19; Each Booster Shot Raises Risk
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:37 pm to Chef Curry
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:37 pm to Chef Curry
I haven’t championed any study. I also haven’t started Covid threads with a clear one sided opinion for the last 3 years like OP has.
And I’m not saying OP is right or wrong. I’m just saying it’s amusing to watch OP come on here saying “Look at the studies” after years of saying the science is fake news.
And I’m not saying OP is right or wrong. I’m just saying it’s amusing to watch OP come on here saying “Look at the studies” after years of saying the science is fake news.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:48 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
after years of saying the science is fake news.
Early on I said I was skeptical about the vaccine and was taking a wait-and-see on it. Then as more and more came out about it I moved to not only not taking it but that there was too much BS around it. Why did they want to hide the information for 75 years?
I also said it was BS we stopped people from taking Ivermectin or exploring it and other alternatives more.
I called Remdesiver poison which it is.
None of that means all science is "fake news"
I have been very consistent in my stances but keep changing what I have said and telling me my own point of view to fit your "gotcha" attempt.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 8:27 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
Look at the studies” after years of saying the science is fake news.
The “science” could have very well been fake news. Academic journal editors and reviewers are notorious for rejecting material they don’t like and accepting material that is dubious. It happens all the time. But given the push for Covid/vaccines to be more than what they were, it’s a no-brainer for journal editors to be selective.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 8:45 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
downvote if you support farting in public
This post was edited on 12/28/22 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 12/29/22 at 6:31 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I also haven’t started Covid threads with a clear one sided opinion for the last 3 years like OP has… after years of saying the science is fake news.
What science? It is in fact fake news
This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 6:33 am
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:19 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:I'd bet anything a lot of the folks using this study as their proof laughed at the studies in the past that weren't peer reviewed.
And I’m not saying OP is right or wrong. I’m just saying it’s amusing to watch OP come on here saying “Look at the studies” after years of saying the science is fake news.
This is a political issue. This is the nature of politics. When you're so far gone on your side of the political spectrum, the facts are no longer primary or even secondary, they simply don't matter at all.
My stance has always been we never should have shut down the entire country, and do whatever you want with respect to the vaccine or how you treat yourself for Covid, don't care.
This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 3:20 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News