quote:
To recap:

1. No one can hold certification of election results until an investigation is held, even the people charged with certifying election results.

2. No one can challenge election results to get an investigation started, including the people who were harmed by what is very likely fraud.

3. No one can sue to hold election results until investigations are performed.

No, the recap is if you are going to challenge election results, then bring some fricking evidence with you.

Certification of elections cannot be delayed just because you don't like the results. Investigations will not be started just because an election was close. And you really should not sue in Federal Court - before or after an election - without evidentiary support for your claims.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by imjustafatkid

Alabama

Member since Dec 2011

50764 posts

Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:41 pm to Dday63

quote:
No, the recap is if you are going to challenge election results, then bring some fricking evidence with you.

Nope. I nailed it. The evidence is pervasive and overwhelming.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TomBuchanan

East Egg, Long Island

Member since Jul 2019

6231 posts

Posted on 12/2/22 at 5:20 pm to Dday63

quote:
No, the recap is if you are going to challenge election results, then bring some fricking evidence with you.

Certification of elections cannot be delayed just because you don't like the results. Investigations will not be started just because an election was close. And you really should not sue in Federal Court - before or after an election - without evidentiary support for your claims.

Why were they covering the counting windows during the 2020 election?

If you can't answer this, then shut the frick up.

This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 5:20 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board