- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alex Stein confronts armed antifa guarding drag queen story time in Denton, TX
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:00 am to minister of truth
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:00 am to minister of truth
quote:Absent harm to the child, yes. The sticky point is how one defines “harm.”
So you think there is no societal/moral limits on what a child can do or be exposed to if the parents agree to it?
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child. Obviously, some posters on this forum feel differently.
quote:Nudists/naturists do so all the time, and I see that as being ABSOLUTELY none of the State’s business.
So according to your argument if a parent thinks it's ok for his/her child to be exposed to an adult's genitalia then the "state" should allow it?
6
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Nudists/naturists do so all the time, and I see that as being ABSOLUTELY none of the State’s business.
Wow, so Drag Queens and nudists are the same in your mind?
Tell me you know nothing about Drag without telling me you know nothing about Drag.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The sticky point is how one defines “harm.”
No shite. Your idea of "harm" may vary greatly from society's. You initially only expressed concern about "physical" harm. So if the parents are ok with ritual animal sacrifice in the town square, you would be ok with children being exposed to that? Public hangings? As long as the children aren't being "physically harmed"?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child.
Monty Python was quite famous for showing men wearing dresses.
Drag and Monty Python may share *some* similar traits, but modern Drag IS SEXUAL IN NATURE,PERIOD, END OF STORY.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child.
Like a moth to a flame, you seem to find yourself in all the grooming and kid diddling threads don't you...
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child. Obviously, some posters on this forum feel differently.
And if that were all it was you’d be right. But drag isn’t simply “men in dresses”, it’s sexual kink. And if the state isn’t able to protect kids from what amounts to sexual exploitation then it really has no reason for existing at all. A society has no more important function than the safety of its children.
This post was edited on 11/21/22 at 8:24 am
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:20 am to AggieHank86
quote:You have a closet full of trench coats, don't you?
Absent harm to the child, yes. The sticky point is how one defines “harm.”
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child. Obviously, some posters on this forum feel differently.
quote:
Nudists/naturists do so all the time, and I see that as being ABSOLUTELY none of the State’s business.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News