quote:
People really don't have/understand principles. If some moron like Robert Reich or AOC was the subject of it, I'd clearly vote to keep them even though they've *actually* violated TOS plenty. Because the concept of freedom of speech literally exists to protect speech that is objectionable, since it's not needed for things everyone agrees with.

Yea what happened to “I don’t like what you’re saying but I’ll defend your right to say it”

Authoritarians need to suppress speech because they must lie to advance their agenda. Truth is their enemy. If they were truthful about their intents nobody would support them, they have to lie and manipulate people.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RCDfan1950

United States

Member since Feb 2007

35092 posts

Posted on 11/19/22 at 8:28 am to deltaland

No matter the 'free speech', or any kind of speech, the very idea that people are stupid enough not to realize that massive immigration of poor and uneducated people will require Government subsidization via the very Programs/Printed Money that funds Social Security, Medicare, Fed Retirement Assets, etc. tells you that said people are too delusional or ignorant to recognize the Truth if it was the nose on their face.

We have a problem that talk cannot solve. The Democratic Fascists know this. As soon as they collapse what is left of the Private Economy they'll own (Cancel MO) the populous to a degree where the only talk that will be allowed will be their version of the 'truth'. Political, Cultural and necessarily Religious.

There can be great comfort in the Faith of "things not seen but hoped for", but not without a based of rational perception re that which currently is. Self-delusion, no matter the impetus, is the road to perdition.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board