Started By
Message

re: Should have taken the Lonzo-Lauri trade

Posted on 11/18/22 at 11:14 pm to
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17956 posts
Posted on 11/18/22 at 11:14 pm to
He's just 25. Young players often get better, especially ones who've had their development slowed by injuries. Bronc is right; there's zero reason to think that he's only thriving because he's in Utah.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/19/22 at 10:02 am to
quote:

there's zero reason to think that he's only thriving because he's in Utah.


he's been very good all along. he's been injured a couple times.
when he's healthy he's very good.
he's too expensive to have in street clothes. I never followed his career so I have no idea whether his injuries were unique events or chronic.

yes, Lonzo for markkenen would have been better than whatever actually came back.
who is benched today to get lauri on the floor?
do you even do the adams jv deal? do you take tm3 with 1.10?
I hate time travel.
This post was edited on 11/19/22 at 10:18 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram