Started By
Message

re: Did out of bounds Bama player have to reestablish himself to become a legal participant

Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:49 am to
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22372 posts
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:49 am to
quote:

.. was applied correctly.

I disagree. The replay booth needed indisputable evidence that Brooks did not have possession to overturn the call on the field. Brooks had two hands on the ball with control. Per NCAA rules on possession:

quote:

Player Possession
The ball is in player possession when a player has the ball firmly in his grasp by holding or controlling it while contacting the ground inbounds.

Team Possession
The ball is in team possession:

During a loose ball if a player of that team last had player possession; or


Call on the field was LSU ball. Brooks had possession before the ball was touched by the out of bounds Bama player, thus call should have been dead ball with LSU possession.

There is no way the replay booth had indisputable video evidence that Brooks was NOT in possession.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28306 posts
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:51 am to
quote:

There is no way the replay booth had indisputable video evidence that Brooks was NOT in possession.



I'd go a step further and say there was no indisputable proof the alabama player touched the ball. If there was I didn't see it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram