- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did out of bounds Bama player have to reestablish himself to become a legal participant
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:49 am to WillyLoman
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:49 am to WillyLoman
quote:
.. was applied correctly.
I disagree. The replay booth needed indisputable evidence that Brooks did not have possession to overturn the call on the field. Brooks had two hands on the ball with control. Per NCAA rules on possession:
quote:
Player Possession
The ball is in player possession when a player has the ball firmly in his grasp by holding or controlling it while contacting the ground inbounds.
Team Possession
The ball is in team possession:
During a loose ball if a player of that team last had player possession; or
Call on the field was LSU ball. Brooks had possession before the ball was touched by the out of bounds Bama player, thus call should have been dead ball with LSU possession.
There is no way the replay booth had indisputable video evidence that Brooks was NOT in possession.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:51 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
There is no way the replay booth had indisputable video evidence that Brooks was NOT in possession.
I'd go a step further and say there was no indisputable proof the alabama player touched the ball. If there was I didn't see it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News