Started By
Message

re: Brooks had possession

Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:13 am to
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
8978 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:13 am to
quote:

No he never had it while down.



I don't see how that matters. We were the last team to posses it when it was ruled dead.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9574 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:22 am to
quote:

I don't see how that matters. We were the last team to posses it when it was ruled dead.

It’s a loose ball until you establish possession. By rule, possession is established the same way for loose balls as it is for catches, the only difference being a loose ball is still live if it hits the ground.

The snapshots of him with two hands on the ball aren’t as meaningful as folks seem to think. I wish someone would post a gif instead.

I’m sure I could find a screenshot of a WR in the endzone with two hands on a football right before it gets knocked out.. doesn’t mean he had possession in the endzone, which is what is required for a touchdown.

The fact that he had a knee down means nothing until he completes the recovery. Just like it means nothing that a WR’s feet are in the endzone until he completes a catch.

I don’t really agree with it being overturned, but I also think they probably got the call right by the letter of the rule.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram