Started By
Message

re: Trying more to understand this fumble non recovery

Posted on 11/6/22 at 6:57 am to
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
21070 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 6:57 am to
It was the correct call, Brooks never had possession
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
32117 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 7:02 am to
quote:

It was the correct call, Brooks never had possession


I’m curious. If 2 hands on the ball doesn’t establish possession, what does? Did it get bobbled? Yea, when the TE touched it from out of bounds. That was AFTER Brooks had 2 hands on the ball and a knee down.

Nothing that was shown was enough to overturn the call on the field.
Posted by Oneforthemoney
New Iberia, La
Member since Dec 2013
1807 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 7:40 am to
He did have possession. Ball on ground, two hands on ball while the ball is on ground, that’s possession .
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram