- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Weren't we supposed to be on the moon again* by now?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:37 pm to Smeg
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:37 pm to Smeg
quote:
1.) It wouldn't have been *that difficult* to fake then.
Okay. Why did they "fake" Apollo 1, then?
quote:
2.) It would have been very difficult for regular people to disprove back then.
But, not scientists in Russia, Switzerland, China, etc., right?
quote:
3.) The US would have the motive, means, and opportunity to fake it then.
This isn't evidence of anything. This is a truism.
quote:
4.) Based on current tech, it almost seems impossible on tech from then.
No. What you're mistaking is capability versus logistics. In order to go to the Moon, a massive infrastructure was built over the course of a decade. Personnel, engineers, manufacturing, communications, command and control, etc., all had to be in place to perform those missions. All that was scaled way, way back in the shuttle era and even then, cost was an overriding concern.
quote:
5.) Based on current tech, it would be very difficult to safely fake again today and not be disproven.
Wait, so what has changed on the "not be disproven" front today? Filmmaking technology has advanced beyond the dreams of Kubrick.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News