- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Pfizer Won’t Share COVID Vaccines With Independent Researchers.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:15 pm
https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/09/23/pfizer-refuses-to-share-covid-vaccines-with-researchers/
Pfizer Won’t Share COVID Vaccines With Independent Researchers.
Pharmaceutical giants including Pfizer and Moderna are refusing to share data and technology from their COVID-19 vaccines with researchers studying alternative treatments for the virus.
The conflict for researchers who are not affiliated with major pharmaceutical companies that manufactured a COVID-19 vaccine is a result of Pfizer and Moderna owning the patents for the current vaccines. Researchers, therefore, have to receive the companies’ permissions to use the vaccines for research into products like nasal or pan-coronavirus vaccines.
Pfizer and Moderna are refusing to share the data, however. Though the decision to withhold COVID-19 vaccine data and information from researchers is legal, it complicates the ability for progress to be made.
Yale University virologist and immunologist Akiko Iwasaki designed a study of nasal vaccines against COVID-19, which she believes would confer better protection against infection and transmission than shots alone. The most accurate version of the study would have been conducted on subjects that have already received ay initial vaccine series, as this would reflect real-world scenarios.
Despite asking Pfizer about the possibility of obtaining some vaccine to use in her study of nasal treatments, she has not received any from the company.
“In order for us to develop a better vaccine, we need a comparator. For that reason, everyone who’s doing research in this area is in the same boat, we don’t have access to do a comparison,” Iwasaki said.
Iwasaki addressed the issue at the White House’s summit on the future of COVID-19 vaccines, and former National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins said at the time that he “would not have thought of that” posing a problem with her research.Separately, California Institute of Technology professor Pamela Bjorkman said her lab has had difficulties obtaining COVID-19 vaccines in order to research ae treatment candidate that could provide protection against a variety of Covid-19 variants.
“Whatever policy prevents using such vials does a great disservice to global efforts to develop new and improved vaccines,” Bjorkman said.
When asked if Pfizer has provided any vaccines for research purposes, spokesperson Sharon Castillo said, “We are not accepting or reviewing applications for possible clinical research that studies the Covid-19 vaccine.” Another Pfizer spokesperson said the company has its own “extensive studies” of the vaccine underway, and will continue to share information from those studies as it becomes available.
Moderna refused to respond to a press query.
Pfizer Won’t Share COVID Vaccines With Independent Researchers.
Pharmaceutical giants including Pfizer and Moderna are refusing to share data and technology from their COVID-19 vaccines with researchers studying alternative treatments for the virus.
The conflict for researchers who are not affiliated with major pharmaceutical companies that manufactured a COVID-19 vaccine is a result of Pfizer and Moderna owning the patents for the current vaccines. Researchers, therefore, have to receive the companies’ permissions to use the vaccines for research into products like nasal or pan-coronavirus vaccines.
Pfizer and Moderna are refusing to share the data, however. Though the decision to withhold COVID-19 vaccine data and information from researchers is legal, it complicates the ability for progress to be made.
Yale University virologist and immunologist Akiko Iwasaki designed a study of nasal vaccines against COVID-19, which she believes would confer better protection against infection and transmission than shots alone. The most accurate version of the study would have been conducted on subjects that have already received ay initial vaccine series, as this would reflect real-world scenarios.
Despite asking Pfizer about the possibility of obtaining some vaccine to use in her study of nasal treatments, she has not received any from the company.
“In order for us to develop a better vaccine, we need a comparator. For that reason, everyone who’s doing research in this area is in the same boat, we don’t have access to do a comparison,” Iwasaki said.
Iwasaki addressed the issue at the White House’s summit on the future of COVID-19 vaccines, and former National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins said at the time that he “would not have thought of that” posing a problem with her research.Separately, California Institute of Technology professor Pamela Bjorkman said her lab has had difficulties obtaining COVID-19 vaccines in order to research ae treatment candidate that could provide protection against a variety of Covid-19 variants.
“Whatever policy prevents using such vials does a great disservice to global efforts to develop new and improved vaccines,” Bjorkman said.
When asked if Pfizer has provided any vaccines for research purposes, spokesperson Sharon Castillo said, “We are not accepting or reviewing applications for possible clinical research that studies the Covid-19 vaccine.” Another Pfizer spokesperson said the company has its own “extensive studies” of the vaccine underway, and will continue to share information from those studies as it becomes available.
Moderna refused to respond to a press query.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:19 pm to Jack Carter
They claimed they needed 75 years to gather the docs to satisfy a judges order.... how long do you think it would take to find them for someone who wants to actually read and understand them (a potential competitor??)
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:22 pm to Jack Carter
Wasn’t this also govt funded or subsidized research?
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:28 pm to Jack Carter
Why would they incriminate themselves?
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:33 pm to Jack Carter
It's all about the money, nothing about actually curing people. I don't expect anything to happen to them in this lifetime, but God will judge them.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 3:36 pm to Jack Carter
Make money off a “deadly virus” via an EUA but refuse to share data.
That’s not right.
That’s not right.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 4:17 pm to Jack Carter
That's public information paid for by the taxpayers. Fick these crooked and evil companies.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 5:53 pm to Jack Carter
Lol, you guys are still talking about COVID vaccines? That's so 2021.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 5:58 pm to Jack Carter
They keep proving we over did it for this common cold.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 5:59 pm to dstone12
quote:
Make money off a “deadly virus” via an EUA but refuse to share data.
EUA should be pulled too since the pandemic is over.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 6:23 pm to dakarx
75 years to gather the data but took less than three years to develop and test the vaccine for safety.
Otay.
Otay.
Posted on 9/24/22 at 8:48 pm to Jack Carter
Good. The mRNA shot needs to be discouraged not expanded.
Popular
Back to top

10











