- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a reasonable defense of not considering the Dollars Trilogy a “true trilogy”?
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:56 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:56 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
All obvious nicknames. He’s given the name “Joe” by the undertaker who he has only just met.
Its like if you met someone at party. And everyone called him “Buddy”, “Guy,” or “Fwend” but he never tells you his actual name. Later someone asks you who you were speaking to. You’re not going to say, “his name is Buddy.” You’re going to say, “I dunno. Didn’t catch his name.”
I’m just pointing out what the argument is, not really agreeing with it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News