Started By
Message

re: Is there a reasonable defense of not considering the Dollars Trilogy a “true trilogy”?

Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:24 pm to
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:24 pm to
All obvious nicknames. He’s given the name “Joe” by the undertaker who he has only just met.

Its like if you met someone at party. And everyone called him “Buddy”, “Guy,” or “Fwend” but he never tells you his actual name. Later someone asks you who you were speaking to. You’re not going to say, “his name is Buddy.” You’re going to say, “I dunno. Didn’t catch his name.”
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48526 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:55 pm to
Yes Joe is not his name and in the other 2 he’s called by nicknames others makeup. The character was based off an old Japanese film about a samurai with no name who gave fake names when he had to.
This post was edited on 8/19/22 at 10:57 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109970 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

All obvious nicknames. He’s given the name “Joe” by the undertaker who he has only just met.

Its like if you met someone at party. And everyone called him “Buddy”, “Guy,” or “Fwend” but he never tells you his actual name. Later someone asks you who you were speaking to. You’re not going to say, “his name is Buddy.” You’re going to say, “I dunno. Didn’t catch his name.”


I’m just pointing out what the argument is, not really agreeing with it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram