Started By
Message

re: Not looking good for MAGA in Alaska

Posted on 8/17/22 at 3:05 am to
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 3:05 am to
quote:

Lisa Murkowsku 50,509
Kelly Tshibaka 49,044


Wouldn't this mean both move forward to a head to head in the NOV general election? If so, not sure why this is "Not looking good for MAGA in Alaska". Being that top 2 is key in this round.
Posted by Texaggie96
Member since Dec 2018
1381 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 3:17 am to
quote:

quote: Lisa Murkowsku 50,509 Kelly Tshibaka 49,044 Wouldn't this mean both move forward to a head to head in the NOV general election? If so, not sure why this is "Not looking good for MAGA in Alaska". Being that top 2 is key in this round.


In ranked voting, everyone's vote counts. If their candidate is nixed (because they lack sufficient votes to advance), their votes go to their next ranked choice.

In this case Democrats will likely vote for Murkowski and Republicans will likely split depending on the candidate they initially voted for).

It indicates that Murkowski likely has more support (for the general election) then Tshibaka.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram