Started By
Message

re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years

Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:45 am to
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:45 am to
quote:

It’s not a random event, it’s time. Evolution doesn’t happen over 10 years, it takes lots time and adaptation. With enough of both a new species can form.


Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable. Evolution is neither. That is not science. It is a fairy tale. A blind belief system. A religion in it’s own.

Fish become philosophers!! Monkeys become men! Nothing created everything! But we can’t prove it.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36223 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable. Evolution is neither. That is not science. It is a fairy tale. A blind belief system. A religion in it’s own


Well if you believe in DNA being used as evidence you might as well believe in evolution, buddy.

Cause the same thing that says you are the father says you are distantly related to your dog. And it's observable and repeatable in everything living thing on the planet.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 8:00 am
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10473 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable.
That's not the definition of scientific method.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36223 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Monkeys become men!


This just proves to me how poorly you understand evolution.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Fish become philosophers!! Monkeys become men! Nothing created everything! But we can’t prove it.

That is a tough one. Equally tough is to reconcile that there was no beginning before God. I just kind of roll with who I find more intelligent; the scientist or the priest.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 7:56 am
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Scientific method by definition is it is observable and repeatable. Evolution is neither. That is not science. It is a fairy tale. A blind belief system. A religion in it’s own.


Your eye/hair color, your mother or father's?
Height?
Mannerisms?
Intellectual capacity?

The science is there; the art is in how to dispell what creationism has taught you and incorporate the observed and repeated into the creationist's narrative, which I believe to be true - we were created and are continuing to be created via evolution.

Mr. Charles Darwin had the gall to ask (REM), but he is not the whole story.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram