- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:05 am to Turf Taint
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:05 am to Turf Taint
Carbon dating is not reliable. I saw they tested a recently dead coyote they found. Carbon dating said it was 10,000 years old. There are hundreds of examples of this. Carbon dating is crap.
3
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:08 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Carbon dating is not reliable. I saw they tested a recently dead coyote they found. Carbon dating said it was 10,000 years old. There are hundreds of examples of this. Carbon dating is crap.
Oh geez.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:16 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Carbon dating is not reliable. I saw they tested a recently dead coyote they found. Carbon dating said it was 10,000 years old. There are hundreds of examples of this. Carbon dating is crap.
What else do you know about Coyotes?
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:23 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Carbon dating is not reliable
C-14 is radioactive and unstable, decaying over time. It's decay is a function of time. That time can be measured and eyeball proof that it happens in a systematic way, universally.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News