Started By
Message

re: According to ‘Lightyear’ director, it’s low rating is due to internet trolls

Posted on 7/8/22 at 8:35 pm to
Posted by HogBalls
Member since Nov 2014
8592 posts
Posted on 7/8/22 at 8:35 pm to
LINK

Damn, Breitbart let them have it in this article.



So the child groomers at the Walt Disney Company decided to gay up the Toy Story franchise, and it not only laid an egg here in America, it bombed all over the world.

Gee, what a shock.

The experts who watch the box office said Lightyear would gross $70 to $85 million domestic and do another $50 to $60 million offshore for a worldwide opening of $135 million. Instead, the gayed-up Toy Story origin story crash-landed with a $51 million domestic opening and only an additional $34 million offshore, for a pathetic $85.6 million worldwide haul.

In other words, Lightyear’s worldwide haul equaled what was supposed to be its domestic haul, and that whachoocall a bigtime flopperoo.

Lightyear reportedly cost $200 million to produce, and you know the predators at Disney must have spent at least another $100 million for worldwide promotion. That’s a $300 million price tag, which means Lightyear will have to gross around $550 to $650 million worldwide just to break even, which seems pretty unlikely.

Do you have any idea how insane and out-of-touch Disney must be to invest $300 million in a movie that includes homosexuality? And not just any kind of movie—a kiddie movie. And not just any kind of kiddie movie, a Toy Story movie!

It’s one thing for the child groomers at Disney to push for gay porn to be allowed in grade schools. That’s no skin off Disney’s bottom line, and they still get what they want, which is young children groomed into sexual playthings they can manipulate and abuse. It is another thing altogether, though, to stick this kind of inappropriate material into a $300 million investment.

Listen, I’m sorry, I know we are not supposed to say this out loud, but I’m going to say it anyway… Other than homosexuals, no one wants to watch any kind of sexual intimacy between same-sex couples. We just don’t. Why? Because — if you’ll pardon the expression — we were born this way. It’s how we’re wired. No one goes to the movies to be made uncomfortable, and parents don’t take their kids to the movies — most especially a Disney movie — to expose them to human sexuality before they are ready.

As I’ve said a million times before, there is nothing wrong with Hollywood making movies for homosexuals. Hollywood should make movies for everyone. What will never sell is mainstreaming homosexuality. There are two reasons for this: 1) it makes 90 percent of the population uncomfortable, and 2) every time it pops up in a movie or TV show it comes off like a lecture instead of a natural part of the story. No one likes a lecture. It makes us roll our eyes. It breaks the storytelling spell. It leaves a bad taste in your mouth. It ruins the whole experience.

My attitude towards how other people live their lives is utter indifference. I don’t care how you live your life. I don’t care how anyone lives their life. You want to have orgies and worship Satan and smoke meth—I don’t care. Just don’t do it on my porch and don’t call me a bigot because I don’t want to watch.

As much as the woketards want to, they cannot rewire human nature.

Human nature is human nature.

Most Americans, including myself, have no problem “tolerating” all of these alternative lifestyles. Live and let live. Consenting adults and all that. What we’ll never do is “accept” or “celebrate” this stuff.

And you can’t make us watch it.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 7/8/22 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Other than homosexuals, no one wants to watch any kind of sexual intimacy between same-sex couples. We just don’t. Why? Because — if you’ll pardon the expression — we were born this way. It’s how we’re wired. No one goes to the movies to be made uncomfortable, and parents don’t take their kids to the movies — most especially a Disney movie — to expose them to human sexuality before they are ready.


I am partial to the lesbian sex scene in Mulholland Drive. But then again David Lynch would be a poor choice for Disney.

Hell, let's put him in the suggestion box. It would result in creative and interesting material
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36103 posts
Posted on 7/8/22 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Damn, Breitbart let them have it in this article


lol
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30955 posts
Posted on 7/8/22 at 11:07 pm to
I do think it's pretty absurd to think the movie flopped entirely on a single same-sex kiss. While it didn't do the movie any favors, it seems like the fact that the movie was boring and had a convoluted plot was much more detrimental to its success.

That would be akin to saying that The Last Jedi isn't a good movie because of the Leia Poppins scene, and disregarding all the other mediocrity in the movie.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18465 posts
Posted on 7/9/22 at 7:42 am to
That article makes a good argument, but I don’t think 90% of people are uncomfortable watching homosexuality displayed on film. Maybe if it’s a sex scene, sure, but two dudes being married, holding hands, and kissing isn’t going to ruin a movie. The problem is this:

quote:

every time it pops up in a movie or TV show it comes off like a lecture instead of a natural part of the story.


This is why people avoid movies - especially blockbuster movies or kid movies - that feature homosexuality. It’s always a tool to corrupt what people think is normal and treat people like they’re too stupid to know what’s best for their own lives.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram