- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ACC Network may end up airing PAC-12 games
Posted on 7/6/22 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 7/6/22 at 6:59 pm
quote:
@RossDellenger
The Pac-12 & ACC are discussing a broadcast partnership that would have the ACC Network - or a new ESPN network - air Pac-12 games on the west coast, sources tell @SINow.
But a question looms: Will it generate enough additional TV cash to be worthwhile?
quote:
Officials from the ACC and Pac-12 are discussing a broadcasting partnership with ESPN that would bring together the two Power 5 leagues from opposite coasts for a mutually beneficial relationship, sources tell Sports Illustrated.
ESPN is trying to save the PAC and combat FOX.
LINK
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:03 pm to Jwho77
Seems like a last ditch Hail Mary
Schools will do what they want in the end.
I'm somewhat surprised by this move with espn unless it's just a smoke screen
Schools will do what they want in the end.
I'm somewhat surprised by this move with espn unless it's just a smoke screen
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:07 pm to Magician2
ESPN doesn't want the PAC to fall apart because they would end up having little to no football content out West. With this move, they can throw the PAC a lifeline that brings in more money for them as well as their disgruntled ACC partners.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:08 pm to Jwho77
Can't wait for Clemson/FSU to try to use this as some sort of breach of the GOR to dip out
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:09 pm to OleVaught14
One would think ESPN has their arse covered on that front.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:16 pm to Jwho77
quote:
One would think ESPN has their arse covered on that front.
Depends on what their end goal is. And what the contract says - i.e. could the ACC schools looking to leave vote against a quasi-merger with the Pac12 to keep the ACC weak
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:18 pm to Jwho77
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/14/23 at 12:14 am
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:21 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
Depends on what their end goal is. And what the contract says - i.e. could the ACC schools looking to leave vote against a quasi-merger with the Pac12 to keep the ACC weak
I'm guessing the majority of ACC schools are not looking to leave because they understand their worth (or lack thereof) so they'll gladly take more money.
ESPN's goal is to keep control of as many assets as possible. If the ACC falls apart, they lose assets to the B1G.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:24 pm to msutiger
quote:
Unless this is going to generate more money, this is a worthless effort.
Which it obviously is (if it happens) since ESPN is behind it. Neither conference would have interest in it if it didn't lead to more money for them.
quote:
Oregon and Washington have eyes on the B10. Everyone knows that.
It may be inevitable but it is clearly not imminent.
quote:
Arizona, Arizona State, Utah and Colorado aren’t going to wait around and watch everything fall apart. They would be smart to make their move now.
Unless they can make as much money or more as they could by leaving if they just keep their historic conference together.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:30 pm to Jwho77
quote:
It may be inevitable but it is clearly not imminent.
That’s the big key though. Why stick around when you know your two biggest remaining assets have a foot out of the door?
Lack of trust causes panic movement.
Only way they can prevent it from happening is if ESPN can guarantee “x” revenue dollars even if multiple teams leave for the Big Ten. Otherwise, that dollar amount seems pretty worthless in the grand scheme.
Nobody wants to be the one without a chair when the music stops. Weirdly enough, the Big 12 seems to be the most stable option.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:44 pm to Jwho77
ESPN has the SEC and the ACC. They don't need to save the Pac-12. If they want a 10pm Saturday game they have the MWC. ESPN with SEC and ACC at 11, 2:30, and 7:00 doesn't need the PAC. There are people who will watch San Diego State versus Air Force at 10pm.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:46 pm to msutiger
quote:
That’s the big key though. Why stick around when you know your two biggest remaining assets have a foot out of the door?
Reports have made it clear that, outside of Notre Dame, the other available schools (ones not in the locked down ACC) are just not attractive from a cash-in vs. cash-out perspective for the SEC and B1G to make any more moves anytime soon.
The schools that are attractive to the Big 12 will still be attractive to them tomorrow and 10 years from now. If ESPN and the ACC can stabilize the PAC, the schools in it that have any value elsewhere will retain that value.
This post was edited on 7/6/22 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:48 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
ESPN has the SEC and the ACC. They don't need to save the Pac-12.
And yet they are trying to do so.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 7:49 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
There are people who will watch San Diego State versus Air Force at 10pm.
Yeah but probably less than will watch Oregon/Stanford. The Mountain West's primary broadcast partner is distant 3rd place network for a reason.
Posted on 7/6/22 at 8:16 pm to OleVaught14
If we've learned anything, it's that contracts don't matter
Posted on 7/6/22 at 8:18 pm to ProjectP2294
Could the ACC pressure ESPN into updated fair market value for their rights, else capitulate to the big 10?
Posted on 7/6/22 at 8:20 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
If they want a 10pm Saturday game they have the MWC.
With apologies to Colorado St and Fresno St and Boise and Hawaii, they’re not the PAC 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News