What Are Your Arguments Against Bill Barr’s Determination The Evidence Was Not Fraudulent?

Listening to the hearings and I admit this is the one piece of evidence against the theory that Trump actually won that I have never been able to refute.

Bill Barr was the top law enforcement officer in the country, and a man who was appointed by Trump. He is also an established statesman with zero reason to believe he would defy his patriotic duties and lie to the country (or betray the GOP) if there had in fact been evidence of fraud.

As a prosecutor, he deals in evidence. I’m not saying it’s not there, but I am saying no one has been able to point me to objective evidence (besides the 2000 Mules fundraising movie, or telling me “it’s there, if you don’t see it then you’re not looking”).

Even the committee admits there was fraud. But there has never been evidence that there was fraud to a level that could have impacted the election.

Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.