Started By
Message

re: Pels stick with Bally

Posted on 6/23/22 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21685 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 2:19 pm to
From the Nola.com article:

quote:

During negotiations, the Pelicans secured flexibility to pursue alternatives within that five-year window as they try to navigate a rapidly changing TV landscape.


Sounds like there was no better present option.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 2:20 pm
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 2:21 pm to
That makes more sense
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14633 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 2:22 pm to
I understand they think the BS app will allow more fans to watch, the problem is it’s prices like it’s an entire television package by itself, he’ll league pass is cheaper, and Bally already has a HORRIBLE app.
Posted by touchdown moses
eunice, LA
Member since Nov 2009
6024 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Earlier this month, the New England Sports Network launched a direct-to-consumer streaming service, NESN360, which costs $29.99 per month or $329.99 annually. Subscribers get access to Boston Red Sox and Boston Bruins games. Bally Sports+ is expected to be considerably less expensive than NESN360. The exact price point of Bally Sports+ in NBA markets has yet to be determined.


At least it sounds like it’ll be less than 30 a month
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 2:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram