You jumped into an argument where a poster was saying brooks career has been better than Rory. That is the conversation you entered into. That isn’t me creating a strawman

Hell, since on tour, brooks has been better than tiger too. But what’s the point of that conversation when we are talking about CAREERS.

The strawman in the conversation was bringing up “since on tour”, since the entire conversation wa s about careers. If Brooke was 6 years younger than Rory it would be worth mentioning, but he isn’t

I have no bone to pick with you because our actual discussions on golf have been good, but you entered this chat about the careers of two golfers.

This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 11:07 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ell_13

Member since Apr 2013

85309 posts

Posted on 6/14/22 at 11:13 am to lsupride87

To be fair, he predicated it on 2015. And to be fair, you thought that was arbitrary when it wasn't. He didn't bring up entire careers until I was already posting. He's sort of avoided it by continuing to bring up 2014/2015. Rory was on fire from 2010 to 2014. 10 PGA tour wins and 4 majors... very comparable to Brooks 2017-2021 honestly. Being close to the same age is certainly a knock on Brooks. But he's had almost a decade on tour where he's been better than Rory nearly every year. The career argument isn't over when they both have another 7-10 years playing. But up till now, it's no doubt Rory because of how well he played as a kid.

1 ...

Report Post

Golf Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board