- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/31/22 at 4:39 pm to moneyg
quote:Not necessarily.
these are mutually exclusive
Baton Rouge could need the money from St. George to support its service contracts, while St. George could still be non-viable without the same service contract terms Baton Rouge currently has.
Still, you would think there is a reasonable way to settle the split, financially speaking.
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 5/31/22 at 5:40 pm to moneyg
quote:
But he ruled that St. George likely would not collect enough money to pay for needed services and account for its share of city-parish retirement costs. The budget presented at trial did not include the cost of paying the sheriff’s office for law enforcement, the ruling state
Don’t parish taxes pay for the Sherif’s office? St. George would still pay Parish taxes.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News