Started By
Message

re: Were the Anti-vaxxers Right all Along?

Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:00 pm to
No, they were not. We'd still be getting smallpox and polio otherwise.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

No, they were not. We'd still be getting smallpox and polio otherwise.


How do we know there aren't other, more effective treatments?

We saw it with Covid.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18739 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

We'd still be getting smallpox and polio otherwise.



You do realize most people who are labeled anti-vaxxer are really selective vaxxers correct?

I would be labeled anti-vax because there are certain vaccines I do not get nor have my children get. That doesn't mean we have had zero vaccines.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60598 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

We'd still be getting smallpox and polio otherwise.

You're conflating attenuated virus vaccines, which are weakened strains of the targeted virus introduced into the body to allow the immune system an opportunity to successfully develop antibodies and the experimental mRNA injectable drug which seeks to replicate the coronavirus spike protein in the hopes the body will mount an immune response.

Those are WORLDS APART, and if you don't realize that, we're probably done here.

HINT: If it doesn't keep you from contracting the virus, being symptomatic of the virus, and SPREADING the virus... it's not a vaccine.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram