re: WTH is the Supreme Court waiting for?

quote:

---

This decision literally changes a prior decision.

---

It's taken 50 years, and even RBG said it was bad law. If a national law were to be 'reinstated', it wouldn't be on RvW premise.

quote:

---

Obviously getting votes altered is the easiest solution, and also the one where they are least likely to get assassinated till it’s exhausted.

---

I'd not put anything past these whackjobs on the Left.

quote:

---

But you’re saying your worried about their life, wel once they make their choice people are gonna wonder how to fix a 6-3 court with lifetime appointment:

---

How are two things related?

Dems had the White House, Senate and House, yet can't stack the courts. They can try, and they will fail. But intimidating, assaulting or 'removing' a Justice (or a member of the Justice's staff or family) so they can't vote is a valid concern.

Not my opinion, but from those in charge whose job it is to see to their security.


The court can hand down a ruling any time it wants. They could hand it down today, if they want to.