quote:
Your strategy of rushing headlong into naming names is a surefire recipe for libel/slander/defamation suits, which only lend credence to the endless "REEEEEEEEEEEEEE"ing from the left and the nutless RINOs.

That is fine. I know what they say happened. They are the ones making the case. I’m saying, if this was their opening argument it missed the mark.

Most of their primary evidence is still just in believe me status.

Example..they only showed 1 cell pattern of life the entire movie. It wasn’t at all tied to a video matching a person. The one graphic also showed locations of drop boxes that didn’t actually exist in reality (it was my County and have these mapped on another project).

Why wouldn’t you show one example of a pattern of life and have it timestapped to a person going to at least one if not more boxes on video?

I get they said they had a hard time BUT they did have Gwinnett video and they did show the one path with multiple Gwinnett boxes.

I’m hopeful they just pulled the trigger too soon. Sometimes you can’t make up that ground when you do that.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by VoxDawg

Glory, Glory

Member since Sep 2012

60591 posts

Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:28 am to RealDawg

quote:
I’m hopeful they just pulled the trigger too soon. Sometimes you can’t make up that ground when you do that.

All the while, the "water under the bridge/we'll get 'em next time!" RINO surrender monkeys are desperate to close the books on 2020 and double pinky swear that the 2022 midterms are going to be the difference maker.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Vacherie Saint

Member since Aug 2015

39575 posts

Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:32 am to RealDawg

You are nit picking because you have a preconceived bias that no fraud was committed.

You say they dont express their geotracking, except they do and your response is "its not enough and my map looks different".

They showed video of clear ballot stuffing. Your response is "I need to see more video".

They find someone willing to come forward. Your response is "I'd like to see more whistleblowers".

They insulate themselves from legal accusations by not naming individuals in the film specifically. Your response is "If they had real evidence, they'd name names".

You wont acknowledge anything they did as legitimate. Yet men hang for less evidence than this. Presidents go down over less than this.

This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 11:04 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by McChowder