- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shell oil reports record profit
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:50 pm to BK Lounge
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:50 pm to BK Lounge
quote:
Explicit subsidies accounted for only 8 percent of the total. The remaining 92 percent were implicit subsidies, which took the form of tax breaks or, to a much larger degree, health and environmental damages that were not priced into the cost of fossil fuels, according to the analysis.
You can’t be serious with this. 8% of that number is actual subsidies.
Then some are “tax breaks” which every company in America gets. With the “ much larger degree” of the remaining 92% being “health and environmental consequences that weren’t factored into the cost of fossil fuels.”
Give me a break. The article on its face admits that the vast majority of that is some made up number by Yale that alleges heath and environmental consequences that it thinks oil and gas companies are responsible for, and because they didn’t pay for them that’s a “subsidy.”
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:57 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
BK, Look at explicit and implicit subsidies of banks, farming, pharma.
Literally this means we are subsidizing you if you get tax breaks (like the standard exemption or itemized exemptions). By this definition we are subsidizing you.
Literally this means we are subsidizing you if you get tax breaks (like the standard exemption or itemized exemptions). By this definition we are subsidizing you.
This post was edited on 5/6/22 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 5/6/22 at 10:01 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
Give me a break. The article on its face admits that the vast majority of that is some made up number by Yale that alleges heath and environmental consequences that it thinks oil and gas companies are responsible for, and because they didn’t pay for them that’s a “subsidy.”
You musta missed the part where I explicitly said I JUST POSTED THE FIRST LINK THAT CAME UP…. Feel free to do ur own research .
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)