Started By
Message

re: MIT peer reviewed covid vaccine study..."significant heart problems"

Posted on 5/5/22 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96568 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 12:07 pm to
Also let’s break the numbers down

That’s 25/100 people calling for heart related issues, to 30/100(just giving example on the 25% increase)

Now, does that sound all that different? Is that even really a noticeable uptick? You see how numbers, phrasing, etc can be used to manipulate? It’s the same thing lefties did with covid

“COVID DOUBLES BREATHING DEATHS IN CHILDREN”

From 1/100,000,000 to 2/100,000,000

This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 12:09 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63483 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

You see how numbers, phrasing, etc can be used to manipulate?


Yes, I see it. You're dismissing the results by using small numbers like "5 more out of every 100" which is certainly an insignificant number.

But you also want everyone to be vaccinated. So what's 5% of 150,000,000 or however many Americans are in the age range being studied? Is 7.5 million more people with heart complications insignificant? Maybe it is. Maybe only half of one percent of those people die. Is 37,500 additional deaths insignificant? Maybe it is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram