Started By
Message

re: Should we build a Dyson Sphere to harvest 100 percent of sunlight?

Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:27 pm to
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27161 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:27 pm to
A Dyson Sphere only makes sense in the context of using a solar system as a fueling station. If you also need direct raw light from the star to sustain life within the solar system, a Dyson Sphere is Armageddon.

It’s a fun concept, but the reality is that even in theory, it generally makes more sense to capture a large portion of the energy from a star, with an emphasis on direction, than it does to capture all of the energy from a star.
This post was edited on 4/30/22 at 9:29 pm
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9542 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

It’s a fun concept, but the reality is that even in theory, it generally makes more sense to capture a large portion of the energy from a star, with an emphasis on direction, than it does to capture all of the energy from a star.

As I understand it, the theory is generally that a Dyson sphere would start as exactly that but then grow exponentially as the civilization has access to more and more energy.

By the time you get to a full sphere, the civilization is harvesting so much energy from the star that direct “natural” light isn’t needed anymore.

At least that’s how I’ve interpreted it, anyhow.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram