- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amateur photo of the Andromeda Galaxy
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:51 pm to MLSter
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:51 pm to MLSter
This is a comment from the guy who took the “picture”
there are a lot of variables to acquiring good data through a telescope. the telescope is attached to a camera, filter wheel and focuser all of which sits on a finely geared equatorial mount, necessary to track the stars within a high degree of precision over the course of many long exposures. the mount is also connected to a second smaller telescope and camera which actually tracks a target star and via a computer program sends commands to the mount to keep the star in the crosshairs. Two other programs run concurrently while imaging: a mount control interface and a sequencer which runs the imaging session: what target, how long, what gain setting, what filter, when to focus, how much to heat the dew heater to keep condensation off lenses. All these systems have to talk to each other for a session to run smoothly, and each of them has their own set of variables. On the rare clear, dark (no moon) night, everything has to run perfectly to get quality data, and acquisition is only part of creating an image. You also need to shoot calibration frames to compensate for optical aberration, noise from the camera and environment, etc. Once you have all the data you need, the second part, processing, has as least as many variables, as you’ve got to take all those 1s and 0s and transform them into a pleasing image. At any step of this process things can go wrong. Hope this helps!
Literally not a real photo
Computer rendition.
there are a lot of variables to acquiring good data through a telescope. the telescope is attached to a camera, filter wheel and focuser all of which sits on a finely geared equatorial mount, necessary to track the stars within a high degree of precision over the course of many long exposures. the mount is also connected to a second smaller telescope and camera which actually tracks a target star and via a computer program sends commands to the mount to keep the star in the crosshairs. Two other programs run concurrently while imaging: a mount control interface and a sequencer which runs the imaging session: what target, how long, what gain setting, what filter, when to focus, how much to heat the dew heater to keep condensation off lenses. All these systems have to talk to each other for a session to run smoothly, and each of them has their own set of variables. On the rare clear, dark (no moon) night, everything has to run perfectly to get quality data, and acquisition is only part of creating an image. You also need to shoot calibration frames to compensate for optical aberration, noise from the camera and environment, etc. Once you have all the data you need, the second part, processing, has as least as many variables, as you’ve got to take all those 1s and 0s and transform them into a pleasing image. At any step of this process things can go wrong. Hope this helps!
Literally not a real photo
Computer rendition.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 11:33 pm to MLSter
quote:
Once you have all the data you need, the second part, processing, has as least as many variables, as you’ve got to take all those 1s and 0s and transform them into a pleasing image. At any step of this process things can go wrong. Hope this helps!
Literally not a real photo
Computer rendition.
So, are you claiming every digital photo, and everything seen on digital TV, is a computer rendition?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News