Started By
Message

re: We could still literally add picks 1 and 2

Posted on 4/9/22 at 5:11 pm to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9839 posts
Posted on 4/9/22 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

He did the same thing with the PG position—-was adamant that CJ wouldn’t play the 1 since he’s never played the one so therefore DG must remain a starter



He just agreed with everything I said earlier (look up). If we get two picks in the top 4, we would trade one or both for a bigger name player most likely a guard. I said Mitchell, he said SGA, it's the same result. Someone is going to the bench until there is an injury (which would probably be pretty quick). It's an obvious move..
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61607 posts
Posted on 4/9/22 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

It's an obvious move..


The problem with that move is it makes CJ an expensive luxury. That's hard to swallow right now because he seems like a perfect fit now, and probably for another 3 years or so. Long term having a CJ replacement in house already is a good thing, it just would be tricky to navigate over the next few years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram