Started By
Message

re: We could still literally add picks 1 and 2

Posted on 4/9/22 at 4:13 am to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9840 posts
Posted on 4/9/22 at 4:13 am to
quote:

Dude stop playing 2k that line-up would be so bad defensively that I don't even want to picture it. And on offense there is not enough shots to go around. Plus there's no way we could afford this.


How would the salaries not match? Graham and Nance make over 20M combined. Throw in Temple and that is 25M+. Mitchell is scheduled to make 30M. It's not an obstacle to match salaries over the summer.

BTW, if we kept those two picks, it would be more expensive. Both of those picks would make around 10M a year. I don't think it counts in the trade. But the trade would save us money.

quote:

And I can't get over you calling Mitchell a borderline top 5 player dude is borderline top 15 and that is being really generous.


Ok. That isn't that big of a deal to me. I think he is arguably the best SG in the league. SG is our biggest hole. We can't get Booker or Luka. Harden, Lillard and Beal are damaged goods to me (way more expensive). So I was looking for a guard to match with McCollum. SGA and Murray are close. But I thought that Mitchell is the better fit.

Do you not believe that we could upgrade at SG? No one wants to play McCollum at SG. We need another shooter that can help spread the floor. It's the best spot to add value.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3676 posts
Posted on 4/9/22 at 8:18 am to
Would Mitchell come off the bench? I’m confused as to where we would play him in this hypothetical unrealistic scenario
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram